KEI'S STUDY ROOM
ホームページ最新月全表示|携帯へURLを送る(i-modevodafoneEZweb

2004年5月
前の月 次の月
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
最新の絵日記ダイジェスト
2021/02/05 complex
2019/07/31 Considerate
2019/03/19 14年
2013/08/10 scorching hot days
2010/01/31 お久しぶり

直接移動: 20212 月  20197 3 月  20138 月  20101 月  200710 9 月  20062 1 月  200512 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 月  200412 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 月 

2004/05/08(土) Thomas Otway 2
In 1680 Otway also published The Poet's Complaint of his Muse, or A Satyr against Libells, in which he retaliated on his literary enemies. An indifferent comedy, The Soldier's Fortune (1681), was followed in February 1682 by Venice Preserved, or A Plot Discover'd. The story is founded on the Histoire de la conjuration des Espagnois contre la Venise, by the Abbé de Saint-Real, but Otway modified the story considerably. The character of Belvidera is his own, and the leading part in the conspiracy, taken by Bedamor, the Spanish ambassador, is given in the play to the historically insignificant Pierre and Jaffier. The piece has a political meaning, enforced in the prologue. The Popish Plot was in Otway's mind, and Anthony, 1st earl of Shaftesbury, is caricatured in Antonio. The play won instant success. It was translated into almost every modern European language, and even Dryden said of it: Nature is there, which is the greatest beauty. The Orphan and Venice Preserved remained stock pieces on the stage until the I9th century, and the leading actresses of the period played Monimia and Belvidera. One or two prefaces, another weak comedy, The Atheist (1684), and two posthumous pieces, a poem, Windsor Castle (1685), a panegyric of Charles II, and a History of the Triumvirates (1686), translated from the French, complete the list of Otway's works.

He apparently ceased to struggle against his poverty and misfortunes. The generally accepted story regarding the manner of his death was first given in Theophilus Cibber's Lives of the Poets. He is said to have emerged from his retreat at the Bull on Tower Hill to beg for bread. A passer-by, learning who he was, gave him a guinea, with which Otway hastened to a baker's shop. He began too hastily to satisfy his ravenous hunger, and choked with the first mouthful. Whether this account of his death be true or not, it is certain that he died in the utmost poverty, and was buried on the 16th of April 1685 in the churchyard of St Clement Danes. A tragedy entitled Heroick Friendship was printed in 1686 as Otway's work, but the ascription is unlikely. [Adapted from Encyclopedia Britannica (1911)]

2004/05/07(金) Thomas Otway 1
Thomas Otway (1652-1685)

English dramatist, was born at Trotton, near Midhurst, Sussex, on the 3rd of March 1652. His father, Humphrey Otway, was at that time curate of Trotton, but Otway's childhood was spent at Woolbeding, a parish 3 m. distant, of which his father had become rector. He was educated at Winchester College, and in. 1669 entered Christ Church, Oxford, as a commoner, but left the university without a degree in the autumn of 1672. At Oxford he made the acquaintance of Anthony Cary, 5th viscount Faikland, through whom, he says in the dedication to Caius Marius, he first learned to love books. In London he made acquaintance with Mrs. Aphra Behn, who in 1672 cast him for the part of the old king in her Forc'd Marriage, or The Jealous Bridegroom, at the Dorset Garden Theatre, but he had a bad attack of stage fright, and never made a second appearance. In 1675 Thomas Betterton produced at the same theatre Otway's first dramatic attempt, Alcibiades, which was printed in. the same year. It is a poor tragedy, written in heroic verse, but was saved from absolute failure by the actors. Mrs. Barry took the part of Draxilla, and her lover, the earl of Rochester, recommended the author of the piece to the notice of the duke of York. He made a great advance on this first work in Don Carlos, Prince of Spain (licensed June 15, 1676; an undated edition probably belongs to the same year). The material for this rhymed tragedy Otway took from the novel of the same name, written in 1672 by the Abbé de Saint-Real, the source from which Schiller also drew his tragedy of Don Carlos. In it the two characters familiar throughout his plays make their appearance. Don Carlos is the impetuous, unstable youth, who seems to be drawn from Otway himself, while the queen's part is the gentle pathetic character repeated in his more celebrated heroines, Monimia and Belvidera. "It got more money," says John Downes (Roscius Anglicanus, 1708) of this play, "than any preceding modern tragedy." In 1677 Betterton produced two adaptations from the French by Otway, Titus and Berenice (from Racine's Bérénice), and the Cheats of Scapin (from Moliere's Fourberies de Scapin). These were printed together, with a dedication to Lord Rochester. In 1678 he produced an original comedy, Friendship in Fashion, popular at the moment, though it was hissed off the stage for its gross indecency when it was revived at Drury Lane in I 749. Meanwhile he had conceived an overwhelming passion for Mrs. Barry, who filled many of the leading parts in his plays. Six of his letters to her survive, the last of them referring to a broken appointment in the Mall. Mrs. Barry seems to have coquetted with Otway, but she had no intention of permanently offending Rochester. In 1678, driven to desperation by Mrs. Barry, Otway obtained a commission through Charles, earl of Plymouth, a natural son of Charles II, in a regiment serving in the Netherlands. The English troops were disbanded in 5679, but were left to find their way home as best they could. They were also paid with depreciated paper, and Otway arrived in London late in the year, ragged and dirty, a circumstance utilized by Rochester in his Sessions of the Poets, which contains a scurrilous attack on his former protégé. Early in the next year (February 1680) was produced at Dorset Garden the first of Otway's two tragic masterpieces, The Orphan, or The Unhappy Marriage, Mrs. Barry playing the part of Monimia. Written in blank verse, which shows a study of Shakespeare, its success was due to the tragic pathos, of which Otway was a master, in the characters of Castalio and Monimia. The History and Fall of Caius Marius, produced in the same year, and printed in 1692, is a curious grafting of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet on the story of Marius as related in Plutarch's Lives.

2004/05/06(木) アルキビアデス Thomas Otway
アルキビアデス

BC450 

 前450ごろ〜前404ごろのアテナイの政治家・将軍。クレイニアスの子。名門アルクマイオン家の血を受ける。幼くして父が戦死,近親にあたるペリクレスの後見のもとで育つ。少年時代からその美しさで多くの求愛者を引きつけた。ソクラテスとの愛については,プラトンの『饗宴』に描かれて,よく知られている。青年時代,ポティダイアの戦いやデリオンの戦いにおいて,武勇を示した。家柄・財産・友人・武功に恵まれて,たびたび人もなげな振る舞いに及んだことが伝えられている。政治にたずさわるようになったのは,ニキアスに対する対抗意識からである。前420年,ペロポンネソスの諸ポリスをアテナイと同盟させ,スパルタに脅威を与えた。前415年,アテナイ市民の野望をあおって,シチリア遠征を決定させる。ニキアスはこれに反対したが,民会はアルキビアデスとニキアスとラマコスを指揮官に選んだ。シチリアに着いてから,出航前から嫌疑をかけられていた事件でアテナイに召喚された。彼は途中で逃亡し,敵スパルタに亡命する。スパルタ側は彼の策をいれて,シチリアに援軍を送り,またアテナイ北方のデケレイアを占領し砦を築いた。ニキアスの遠征軍は全滅し,アテナイは北方からの補給路を絶たれて窮地に陥った。前412年にはイオニアにむかい,各地をアテナイから離反させる。このころからスパルタ側からも嫌疑を受けるようになったので,ペルシアと結んでアテナイへの復帰を企てた。サモス島に集結していたアテナイ海軍の指導者たちは,彼の説得に応じて民主制変革を求める使者をアテナイに送った。しかしサモスでは形勢が逆転し,兵士たちは民主制を支持することを決めて,彼を復帰させ,指揮官に選んだ。数年間各地に転戦して勝利をあげ,前407年にアテナイに帰還。そののち政敵から告発され,出征中の船隊を離れてトラキアに移った。アテナイが降伏してのち,30大政権の主導者クリティアスは,スパルタ王リュサンドロスを説いて,アルキビアデスを殺させた。

2004/05/01(土) The Problem of Definite Descriptions
The Problem of Definite Descriptions
The predicates prefixed with the definite article that refer to one and only one individual are definite descriptions, while those prefixed with the indefinite article, some, all and so on that can refer to more than one individuals are indefinite descriptions. Can the definite descriptions identify the essence of the individual and take the place of proper names?

Let the unique philosopher indicated by a proper name Aristotle be x. You can attribute a definite description to it as follows:

X was the teacher of Alexander the Great.

But you cannot substitute the definite description the teacher of Alexander the Great for the proper name Aristotle. Therefore, even if historians should discover that no one had ever taught Alexander the Great, we will say, Aristotle was not the teacher of Alexander the Great instead of Alexander did not exist.

This indicates that the proposition, X is the teacher of Alexander the Great is not analytic and the definite description is not the essence of x. You can attribute other predicates such as the disciple of Plato, the author of the Nicomachean Ethics and so on, but none of them can be the essence of x.

How about the proper name Aristotle, then? Is it the rigid designator that essentially refers to x? No. Even if historians should discover that he was not called Aristotle those days, we will say, X was not called Aristotle instead of Alexander did not exist.

Another problem: there must have been many nameless people called Aristotle. You cannot identify x only with that name. So, Aristotle is not the essence of x.

Is the essence of x the spatio-temporal existence that still remains even if you deprive it of all the predicates such as Aristotle, the teacher of Alexander the Great, the disciple of Plato and so on? No. If x does not have any predicates attributed to it, we cannot recognize it. The entity we can never recognize is not really or ideally.

Although the connection between x and predicates is accidental, x could not exist, if it were not for any predicates attributed to it. This relation is the same as that between whole and part. You cannot reduce the whole to a particular part, but the whole cannot exist without any parts.

This metaphor provides us with an important clue as to what the essence is. The essence of x is not a predicate that satisfies the blank of the analytic propositional function, X is..., but the function at the meta-level that unifies predicates. It follows that losing some predicates do not prevent x from identifying its essence so long as this function works.

Suppose the predicates I could know about an individual y were only three: 1. y was named Richard Rockwell, 2. y was a family therapist, 3. y majored in sociology.

Stage 1. Later I was informed that y was not a family therapist but a college instructor. So, I judged y was a college instructor named Richard Rockwell, who majored in sociology.

Stage 1. Later I was informed that what y majored in was not sociology but history. So, I judged y was a college instructor named Richard Rockwell, who majored in history.

Stage 1. Later I was informed that y was called not Richard Rockwell but Allen Olsen. So, I judged y was a college instructor named Allen Olsen, who majored in history.

If the three pieces of information were given to me at once, I would conclude that y did not exist. But by replacing predicates one by one, I continued to believe in the existence of y.

This might remind you of the body identity. Metabolism replaces all the matter that composes our bodies little by little within a certain period of time. You cannot replace your body with another's at once, but you can gradually renew your body without losing your identity.

I explained in the previous article that existence is a real being while essence is an ideal being. Existence and essence is not in the relation of substance and accident. Both of them as substance have their accidents on their levels. Namely, both in the ideal subject/predicate and the body/matter relation, substance as the whole does and does not depend on accidents as parts.


 Copyright ©2003 FC2 Inc. All Rights Reserved.